nanog mailing list archives
Re: Someones being naughty again...
From: Marc Slemko <marcs () znep com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 23:36:13 -0700 (MST)
On Fri, 13 Mar 1998, Pat Darisme wrote:
I don't see a problem here ?
Not unless you have a larger MTU on the "outside" interface than the "inside" interface, then you lose bigtime. I would check to see if this is the case in this situation, but those addresses don't come into my network so I can't. Offhand, I can't think of any other problems but I really discourage people from using internal address space for this purpose because it: - breaks stuff like path MTU discovery, etc. when filtered. - prevents easy identification of links, whose they are, etc. because you can't have reverse DNS and the addresses don't belong to you. - causes confusion when multiple networks that are using such addresses are merged or interconnected in the wrong (right) way. I like the idea behind why you would do it, but... can't justify it.
Current thread:
- Someones being naughty again... Marc Hurst (Mar 13)
- Message not available
- Re: Someones being naughty again... Pat Darisme (Mar 13)
- Re: Someones being naughty again... Marc Slemko (Mar 13)
- Re: Someones being naughty again... Phil Howard (Mar 14)
- Re: Someones being naughty again... Blake Willis (Mar 15)
- Re: Someones being naughty again... Marc Slemko (Mar 13)
- Re: Someones being naughty again... Alec H. Peterson (Mar 14)
- Re: Someones being naughty again... Marc Slemko (Mar 14)
- Re: Someones being naughty again... Alec H. Peterson (Mar 15)
- Re: Someones being naughty again... Pat Darisme (Mar 13)
- Re: [nanog] Re: Someones being naughty again... S.T.Balbach (Mar 14)
- Re: [nanog] Re: Someones being naughty again... Dean Anderson (Mar 14)
- Message not available
- Re: Someones being naughty again... Marc Hurst (Mar 14)
- Re: Someones being naughty again... Daniel Reed (Mar 14)