nanog mailing list archives

Re: So, 11.3 anyone?


From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil () domino org>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 16:51:44 +0000

On Thu, 12 Mar 1998 08:56:52 +0100 (MET) 
 Christian Kratzer <ck () toplink net> wrote:

Geez, and I though Ascend was bad for differing release, Peter, shall
we kick of a thread about that here? :-)

Sigh,
Neil.

Hi

So, a potential reason came up for me to possibly run 11.3. I really don't
want to, but I am comtemplating it.

Apparently, 11.3 has code to fast-switch policy-routed networks. Does it
work? Is 11.3 really usable? I am scared to death, but may need this for a
certain application.

we are running policy routing on our 3640 and 7206 machines and we quite fine
 
without fast switched policy routing.  I would only think of using it if 
the cpu overhead starts getting unconformatably high.  

At the moment we are running 112-11.P without any major tilts.

Greetings
Christian Kratzer
Toplink

-- 
TopLink GbR, Internet Services                        info () toplink net
Christian Kratzer                             http://www.toplink.net/
Phone:        +49 7032 2701-0
Fax:  +49 7032 2701-19        FreeBSD spoken here!





--
Neil J. McRae. Alive and Kicking.     
neil () DOMINO ORG    NetBSD-1.3 released! ftp://ftp.uk.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD
  Free the daemon in your <A HREF="http://www.NetBSD.ORG/";>computer!</A>



Current thread: