nanog mailing list archives
Re: Digex transparent proxying
From: "Sean M. Doran" <smd () clock org>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 07:30:08 -0700
Cool, Karl. Then you would be denying your customer access to a market -- a potentially large market -- without telling them. Even only indirectly countable "views" are good for brand managers and marketers, hence the popularity of such things as outdoor advertising. Ironic. Where can they sue? Sean.
Current thread:
- Re: Digex transparent proxying, (continued)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Karl Denninger (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Rich Sena (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Karl Denninger (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Rich Sena (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying andrew khoo (Jun 29)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Rich Sena (Jun 27)
- RE: Digex transparent proxying Derek Elder (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Paul Vixie (Jun 29)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Jeremy Porter (Jun 30)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Karl Denninger (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Rich Sena (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Karl Denninger (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Rich Sena (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Karl Denninger (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Mark Milhollan (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Paul Vixie (Jun 29)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Hank Nussbacher (Jun 29)