nanog mailing list archives

Re: Digex transparent proxying


From: Karl Denninger <karl () mcs net>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 09:11:03 -0500

On Sat, Jun 27, 1998 at 03:39:48AM +0000, Michael Shields wrote:
In article <35935600.FF54EBFE () infowest com>,
"Aaron D. Gifford" <agifford () infowest com> wrote:
It might also be time for content providers of time-sensitive data on the web
to redirect requests coming from Digex' proxy harvest machines to a web page
that says something along the lines of "Digex has intercepted your web request
and directed it through their web caching system.  This impacts the
time-sensitive data at this site.  Hence you cannot access this site in this
manner.

Any content provider savvy enough to put that up could just as easily
put in the proper headers to tag their content as cacheable or
uncacheable or cacheable until time X, and that would be better for
*everyone* involved.
-- 
Shields, CrossLink.

Or detect a proxy and refuse service (which, if I was doing this, is exactly
what I would do).

Not to mention those to derive advertising revenue from "views", and have no
way to measure them in a cached environment.  If I was doing that, I would
also deny service to proxy servers and display a nice message telling the
user to remove the proxy or bitch about its forced use.

--
-- 
Karl Denninger (karl () MCS Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin
http://www.mcs.net/          | T1's from $600 monthly / All Lines K56Flex/DOV
                             | NEW! Corporate ISDN Prices dropped by up to 50%!
Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS
Fax:   [+1 312 803-4929]     | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost


Current thread: