nanog mailing list archives
Re: Network collapses
From: Manar Hussain <manar () ivision co uk>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 06:45:57 +0100
Nothing. First the courts would appoint someone to run the company on behalf of the creditors. Then someone would buy the assets and customers for 10 cents on the dollar. Operational impact will be minimal to nonexistent.
Effectively this argument is "UUNET are way to big for the market to ever let this happen". Almost certainly true - but this is a real danger sign. It is that sort of situation that actually begs for a crash (as much as anything does) and the more "it just can't happen" it is then the bigger the crash will be. Holds a lot in common with how the dynamics of stock market crashes. Besides - if it won't happen to UUNET it may still happen to someone smaller but still big enough to be of concern ... Manar
Current thread:
- Network collapses Mark R. Lindsey (Jun 07)
- Re: Network collapses Michael Dillon (Jun 07)
- Re: Network collapses Jon Lewis (Jun 07)
- Re: Network collapses Alex P. Rudnev (Jun 08)
- Re: Network collapses Michael Dillon (Jun 08)
- Re: Network collapses Dean Anderson (Jun 08)
- Re: Network collapses Jon Lewis (Jun 07)
- Re: Network collapses Manar Hussain (Jun 08)
- Re: Network collapses Michael Dillon (Jun 07)