nanog mailing list archives

Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic


From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () scfn thpl lib fl us>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 14:24:41 -0400

On Fri, May 29, 1998 at 11:31:27PM -0400, Steve Sobol wrote:
I wonder how much bandwidth at the MAEs could be saved if more areas
built local low-cost NAPs just for local traffice exchanges?

I think there's a lot of merit to this proposal. When I first signed on with
a local Internet provider, the owner explained to me that GEOGRAPHIC
proximity does not always equal INTERNET proximity. Back then (1991-92)
there was not a lot of infrastructure, so often that couldn't be helped. It's
quite different now, though.

No it's not.

There's still little confluence between the two distance metrics.  :-)

You're correct in noting that the infrastructure will support it now,
though.

Gotta go find me a vulture capitalist...

Cheers,
- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                                                jra () baylink com
Member of the Technical Staff             Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued
The Suncoast Freenet      "Two words: Darth Doogie."  -- Jason Colby,
Tampa Bay, Florida             on alt.fan.heinlein             +1 813 790 7592

Managing Editor, Top Of The Key sports e-zine ------------ http://www.totk.com


Current thread: