nanog mailing list archives

Re: Interesting stratum 1 NTP clock


From: Shawn David Solomon <sdsolomo () iupui edu>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 1998 08:50:56 -0500 (EST)

  
 I'm glad we've wandered upon the topic of stratum 1 clocks.  I've been
looking for a clock that has the capability to provide clocking to Cisco
ATM switches (BPX's) and also provide a clock source for our unix hosts.
Do they make such a beast?  is it a good idea to use the clock for both
purposes?

 Any help/comments welcomed..

 shawn




On Thu, 25 Jun 1998, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:


   From: Tim Pozar <pozar () lns com>

   > Would a GPS hooked to the serial port of a Linux box do the same?

   No.  You need to dectect the event of the second. Some OEM GPS boxes will
   have another pin that will go low/high when this event occurs.

In places where I've seen this done, that pin usually ended up tied to
DCD.  The Cisco appears to permit this to be on { RI, DSR, DTR, CTS,
RTS, DCD } and also support an "inverted" signal, which I take to mean
high->low transition is PPS, not low->high.  It is noteworthy that
certain manufacturers (Rockwell and possibly Trimble come immediately
to mind) do not synchronize the PPS pulse to the top of the second as
standardized by USNO (and indirectly BIH) but rather just give you one
pulse per second starting at an arbitrary (but accurately expressed in
the NMEA sentence!) point in the second.

   Also, beware that currently GPS time is 12 seconds fast from UTC.

Not if you have a "good" GPS that picks up that data in the ephemeris
and corrects automatically.  Almost all of them will do this now.
Your average end-user has no interest in the fact that GPS has no
concept of "leap seconds" to bring itself into compliance with
international standard time, and thus should not have to compensate
for it.

                                        ---Rob





Current thread: