nanog mailing list archives
Re: Reporting Little Blue Men
From: Paul Ferguson <ferguson () cisco com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 23:33:44 -0500
At 07:09 PM 1/22/98 -0500, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
Yes, it could be, but let's remember; isn't the smurf attack the one that _depends_ on a forged _source_ IP address in order to "work"?
And, as an aside, the draft-ferguson-ingress-filtering-03.txt draft has been advanced by the IESG to published as an Informational RFC. Please go beat people over the head with it, when it is published. Thank you for your attention, - paul
Current thread:
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men, (continued)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Michael S. Fischer (Jan 22)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Steve Sobol (Jan 23)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Dave Rand (Jan 21)
- RE: Reporting Little Blue Men Dave Van Allen (Jan 21)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Eric Osborne (Jan 21)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Justin W. Newton (Jan 22)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Paul Ferguson (Jan 22)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Eric Osborne (Jan 22)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Justin W. Newton (Jan 22)
- Message not available
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 22)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Paul Ferguson (Jan 22)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Karl Denninger (Jan 23)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Justin W. Newton (Jan 23)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Randy Bush (Jan 23)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Justin W. Newton (Jan 23)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Eric Osborne (Jan 21)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Dalvenjah FoxFire (Jan 23)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 23)