nanog mailing list archives
Re: Reporting Little Blue Men
From: ^Faust^ <faust () grift com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 12:09:06 -0800
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
Ok, but some case I just saw mentioned somewhere drew a line between people looking at things, and programs processing them automatically, placing the former in the category of editorial control, but not the latter. Don't remember the context, think it was Usenet. Presumably, if that legal theory held, it could be applied to spaminators, as well.
It was the data tap that the government did on the Argentinian cracker lastyear. Their program output data only when the keywords were present and even then it was only n characters before and after the keyword. -- "Gas, grass, or ass, nobody rides for free."
Current thread:
- Reporting Little Blue Men Eric Wieling (Jan 20)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Adrian Bool (Jan 20)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Dean Anderson (Jan 20)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Martin Hannigan (Jan 20)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men M. David Leonard (Jan 21)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Jordyn A. Buchanan (Jan 21)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Dave Siegel (Jan 21)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Dean Anderson (Jan 21)
- Message not available
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 21)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men ^Faust^ (Jan 21)
- Message not available
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 21)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men NetSurfer (Jan 21)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Phil Howard (Jan 21)
- Message not available
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 21)
- Re: Reporting Little Blue Men Gary E. Miller (Jan 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Reporting Little Blue Men Dave Van Allen (Jan 20)