nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP community based IP filtering
From: "Dorian R. Kim" <dorian () blackrose org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 19:16:05 -0500
On Thu, Jan 15, 1998 at 07:54:30PM -0500, Alan Hannan wrote:
The thrust of my goal, mangled as it was, was that this become fairly common and expected. If so, then one could communicate and act upon routes based upon their associated BGP communities. This, imho, would be a very good thing.
Agreed. An operator community concensus to this affect to the vendors would be a good thing. I did not mean to dispute this point, and meant only to point out that some venues are better than others for efforts such as this. -dorian
Current thread:
- BGP community based IP filtering Matt Ryan (Jan 15)
- Re: BGP community based IP filtering Jerry Scharf (Jan 15)
- Re: BGP community based IP filtering Alan Hannan (Jan 15)
- Re: BGP community based IP filtering Dorian R. Kim (Jan 15)
- Open Standards vs IOPS etc [was Re: BGP community based IP filtering] Chris Layton (Jan 16)
- Re: Open Standards vs IOPS etc [was Re: BGP community based IP filtering] Dorian R. Kim (Jan 16)
- Re: Open Standards vs IOPS etc [was Re: BGP community based IP filtering] Howard C. Berkowitz (Jan 16)
- Re: BGP community based IP filtering Dorian R. Kim (Jan 15)
- Message not available
- Re: Open Standards vs IOPS etc [was Re: BGP community based IP filtering] Paul Ferguson (Jan 16)
- Re: BGP community based IP filtering Alan Hannan (Jan 16)
- Re: BGP community based IP filtering Dorian R. Kim (Jan 15)
- Is Whois.ra.net Server process down ???? Network Operations Center (Jan 16)
- Re: Is Whois.ra.net Server process down ???? John Hawkinson (Jan 16)
- Re: Is Whois.ra.net Server process down ???? Abha Ahuja (Jan 16)