nanog mailing list archives
Re: route ingress
From: Tony Li <tli () juniper net>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 22:26:19 -0800 (PST)
| Are there any pointers? There will be an ID as soon as it's cooked. Expect it this month (Jan). Tony | > The only real solution is strong cryptographical authentication of | > the ownership of routing prefixes. For some reason i do not see | > any serious work in that direction being done. | | Actually, it is being done. It's not ready for implementation yet.
Current thread:
- Re: route ingress Tony Li (Dec 31)
- Re: route ingress Jeremy Porter (Jan 05)
- new: SPAM with TCP-forgery Charles Howes (Jan 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: route ingress Sean M. Doran (Jan 06)
- Re: route ingress John A. Tamplin (Jan 06)
- Re: route ingress Sean M. Doran (Jan 08)
- Re: route ingress Vadim Antonov (Jan 06)
- Re: route ingress Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 07)
- Re: route ingress Sean M. Doran (Jan 08)
- Re: route ingress John A. Tamplin (Jan 06)
- Re: route ingress Vadim Antonov (Jan 07)
- Re: route ingress Jeremy Porter (Jan 05)