nanog mailing list archives

smurf... still?


From: Daniel Reed <djr () narnia n ml org>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 20:40:49 -0500 (EST)

I was looking through a modified copy of smurf.c I had (it listened on a
port and when an incoming connection was detected, it asked for a host and
then smurfed it--or so the documentation says, I just wanted to see how
the port listening was achieved) and just wanted to check how many of the
broadcasts in the default bcastaddr[] still were smurfable, and noted that
the *very first one* was. How would I go about finding out the
administrative contact for a network given its broadcast address?
Specifically I'm looking for 165.154.1.255, but there are probably some
others as well...


root@narnia:~# ping -c2 165.154.1.255
PING 165.154.1.255 (165.154.1.255): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 165.154.1.26: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=287.2 ms
64 bytes from 165.154.1.66: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=309.0 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 165.154.1.7: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=338.9 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 165.154.125.53: icmp_seq=0 ttl=242 time=358.8 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 165.154.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=388.9 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 127.0.0.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=399.1 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 165.154.1.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=418.8 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 165.154.1.57: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=439.0 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 165.154.1.4: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=449.0 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 165.154.1.21: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=459.0 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 165.154.125.53: icmp_seq=1 ttl=242 time=219.8 ms

--- 165.154.1.255 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, +10 duplicates, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 219.8/378.0/468.9 ms
root@narnia:~#

(what the heck is that 127.0.0.2 doing in there...?)

--
Daniel Reed <n () narnia n ml org> (3CE060DD)
System administrator of narnia.n.ml.org (narnia.mhv.net [199.0.0.118])
What does not destroy me, makes me strong. -- Friedrich Nietzsche



Current thread: