nanog mailing list archives
Re: MTU of the Internet?
From: "Sean M. Doran" <smd () clock org>
Date: 07 Feb 1998 20:17:17 -0800
Eric Osborne <osborne () notcom com> writes:
We all know that there's good reasons for all sorts of different MTUs, mainly because of the different types of traffic you could have - there's always going to be a tradeoff between efficient transfer of large blocks of data and immediaecy (sp?) of response time.
I know no such thing. My understanding of MTU is that the Maximum Transmission Unit indicates the largest IP datagram a logical transport medium is able to carry without fragmentation. There are, however, reasons why one might choose to send a datagram (which may contain a TCP segment or some other traffic) at smaller sizes than the transport medium or media may support. Sean.
Current thread:
- Re: MTU of the Internet?, (continued)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Marc Slemko (Feb 04)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Sean M. Doran (Feb 08)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Eric Osborne (Feb 04)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Perry E. Metzger (Feb 04)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Tony Li (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Jim Dixon (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Eric Osborne (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Frank Kastenholz (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Ron Fitzherbert (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Sean M. Doran (Feb 07)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Sean M. Doran (Feb 07)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Scott Whyte (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Steve Carter (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Phil Howard (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Perry E. Metzger (Feb 05)
- The 'tude [Was MTU of the Internet?] Steve Carter (Feb 05)
- Re: The 'tude [Was MTU of the Internet?] Perry E. Metzger (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Jeff Stehman (Feb 05)