nanog mailing list archives
RE: Transparent Caching Solutions - Information Wanted
From: Barry Raveendran Greene <bgreene () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 00:28:35 +0800
On Thursday, February 05, 1998 9:14 AM, Matt Ranney [SMTP:mjr () ranney com] wrote:
I'm not sure sure that hit rate should be the primary means of measuring the effectiveness of an HTTP proxy/cache.
Aggreed! When running the Cache Cluster at SingNet (Singapore Telecom) we were more interested in the bytes served vs bytes fetched. Barry
Current thread:
- RE: Transparent Caching Solutions - Information Wanted, (continued)
- RE: Transparent Caching Solutions - Information Wanted Rose, JulianX (Feb 03)
- Re: Transparent Caching Solutions - Information Wanted Bill Unsworth (Feb 04)
- Re: Transparent Caching Solutions - Information Wanted Lyndon Levesley (Feb 04)
- Re: Transparent Caching Solutions - Information Wanted Paul A Vixie (Feb 04)
- Re: Transparent Caching Solutions - Information Wanted Matt Ranney (Feb 05)
- Message not available
- MTU size & IP packet size distributions Ran Atkinson (Feb 05)
- Re: Transparent Caching Solutions - Information Wanted Paul A Vixie (Feb 05)
- Re: Transparent Caching Solutions - Information Wanted Paul A Vixie (Feb 04)
- Re: Transparent Caching Solutions - Information Wanted Dirk Harms-Merbitz (Feb 04)
- Re: Transparent Caching Solutions - Information Wanted Paul Gauthier (Feb 04)
- RE: Transparent Caching Solutions - Information Wanted Barry Raveendran Greene (Feb 05)