nanog mailing list archives
Re: follow up on gigabit either
From: John Fraizer <John.Fraizer () EnterZone Net>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 00:35:47 -0500
It's kinda hard to flood the ARP table of an ATM switch and have it let you see the traffic on another PVC. It can be done with a switch. (Not necessarily _all_ switches but, some.) At 08:00 PM 12/23/98 -0800, you wrote:
K wrote: [useful summary of gigabit ether situation]Steve also made exclnt point that the ATM vs 'promiscuous' medium have other inherent distinction of potential interest to ISPs with policy/privacy/security concernsI'm not quite sure I understand this bit; isn't switched ether (of any speed) equally secure as an ATM switch would be? -george william herbert gherbert () crl com I speak only for myself
------------------------------------------------------------------ ML.ORG is gone. Check out http://www.EZ-IP.Net - It's *FREE* ------------------------------------------------------------------ Get your *FREE* Parked Domain account at http://www.EZ-Hosting.Com ------------------------------------------------------------------ John Fraizer | __ _ | The System Administrator | / / (_)__ __ ____ __ | The choice mailto:John.Fraizer () EnterZone Net | / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / | of a GNU http://www.EnterZone.Net/ | /____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ | Generation PGP Key fingerprint = 7DB6 1CA2 DAA6 43DA 3AAF 44CD 258C 3D7E B425 81A8
Current thread:
- follow up on gigabit either k claffy (Dec 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: follow up on gigabit either George Herbert (Dec 23)
- Re: follow up on gigabit either Dorian Kim (Dec 23)
- Re: follow up on gigabit either John Fraizer (Dec 23)