nanog mailing list archives

Re: AUTORESPONDERS : Gentle Reminder


From: Charles Sprickman <spork () inch com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 02:58:31 -0500 (EST)

If you use procmail to filter things, follow the instructions here:

http://www.inch.com/info/tech/HOWTOS/vacation.html

and make sure the line you add is the very last rule.  This will avoid any
possibility of bounces to lists.  I'm on /usr/bin/vacation now, and it's
kept me from bouncing...  Just thought I'd add this nugget, as lots of
places use procmail as the delivery agent, and it can be a pain to set up
in your .procmailrc if you're not familiar with the syntax.

Charles

-- 
=-----------------=                                        = 
| Charles Sprickman                       Internet Channel |
| INCH System Administration Team         (212)243-5200    |
| spork () inch com                          access () inch com  |
=                                         =----------------=

On Wed, 23 Dec 1998, Andrew Partan wrote:

No, the list is not fine. It should set the Precendence level. Your method
would automatically assume that anyone who BCC'ed you was a mailing list. 

That's OK - I don't want to send vacation mail to folks that BBC
me either.

Useful rules (taken from 'man vacation'):
     No message will be sent unless login (or an alias supplied
     using the -a option) is part of either the ``To:'' or ``Cc:''
     headers of the mail.  No messages from ``???-REQUEST'',
     ``Postmaster'', ``UUCP'', ``MAILER'', or ``MAILER-DAEMON''
     will be replied to (where these strings are case insensitive)
     nor is a notification sent if a ``Precedence: bulk'' or
     ``Precedence: junk'' line is included in the mail headers.

Anyhow, enough non-operation junk for now.
      --asp () partan com (Andrew Partan)




Current thread: