nanog mailing list archives
Re: poll: are any sizable exchange points using gigabit ether?
From: "William F. Maton" <wmaton () enterprise ic gc ca>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 16:23:43 -0500 (EST)
Hiya kc! On Tue, 22 Dec 1998, k claffy wrote:
or are folks pretty much (ATM?)-switch tech'ed?
ATM: A Total Mess.
or do folks have plans to migrate to gig ether (or to definitely Not to, for some reason?)
For connectivity to NAP's like CA*Net 3, GigE.
(or change 'gig ether' to some other imminent.technology.that.might.be. compelling.enuf.to.displace.atm)
Problem with gigE is distance though... So ATM may be the answer for the short term.
if u wanna send messages 2 me i'll compile/post to save b/w (which presumably saves much more b/w if am posting via atm switches but etc)
I'm not even touchin that one with 11-foot pole! :-)
k
wfms
Current thread:
- poll: are any sizable exchange points using gigabit ether? k claffy (Dec 22)
- Re: poll: are any sizable exchange points using gigabit ether? William F. Maton (Dec 22)
- Re: poll: are any sizable exchange points using gigabit ether? Austin Schutz (Dec 23)
- Re: poll: are any sizable exchange points using gigabit ether? Jerry Scharf (Dec 23)
- Re: poll: are any sizable exchange points using gigabit ether? Stephen Stuart (Dec 23)
- Re: poll: are any sizable exchange points using gigabit ether? Steve Feldman (Dec 23)
- Re: poll: are any sizable exchange points using gigabit ether? Austin Schutz (Dec 23)
- Re: poll: are any sizable exchange points using gigabit ether? William F. Maton (Dec 22)
- Re: poll: are any sizable exchange points using gigabit ether? Neil J. McRae (Dec 23)