nanog mailing list archives
Re: Question about NANOG charter
From: hhui () arcfour com (Hui-Hui Hu)
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 16:48:54 -0800
IMNSHO - NANOG is not a NOC, and end-users are 99% of the time going to be much happier if they call their upstreams directly. Also many many people mistake NANOG for inet-access or com-priv or cisco-nsp (myself included, often). Back to normal life -h : As a general question, is this mailing list concerned with the : operation of end nodes? It was always my thought that network : operations covered the ether between end nodes. : I don't want to start a big debate, though I would prefer a public : answer by a clued party.
Current thread:
- heads up ... another imapd attack source Phil Howard (Dec 14)
- Re: heads up ... another imapd attack source Christian Nielsen (Dec 14)
- Re: heads up ... another imapd attack source Craig A. Huegen (Dec 14)
- Security clearinghouses (was Re: heads up ... another imapd etc.) John Bashinski (Dec 16)
- Question about NANOG charter (Re: heads up ... another imapd attack source) Bradley Reynolds (Dec 14)
- Re: Question about NANOG charter (Re: heads up ... another imapd attack Phil Howard (Dec 14)
- Re: Question about NANOG charter Hui-Hui Hu (Dec 14)
- Re: Question about NANOG charter (Re: heads up ... another imapd attack source) Roeland M.J. Meyer (Dec 14)
- Re: Question about NANOG charter (Re: heads up ... another John Hawkinson (Dec 15)
- Re: Question about NANOG charter (Re: heads up ... another Jeff Aitken (Dec 16)
- Re: heads up ... another imapd attack source Christian Nielsen (Dec 14)
- Re: heads up ... another imapd attack source Roeland M.J. Meyer (Dec 14)
- Re: heads up ... another imapd attack source David P. Maynard (Dec 14)
- Message not available
- Re: heads up ... another imapd attack source Roeland M.J. Meyer (Dec 15)
- Re: heads up ... another imapd attack source Dave Crocker (Dec 16)
- Re: heads up ... another imapd attack source Roeland M.J. Meyer (Dec 15)