nanog mailing list archives

Re: Transaction Based Settlements Encourage Waste (was Re: BBN /GTEI)


From: owen () DeLong SJ CA US (Owen DeLong)
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 08:14:35 -0700


Well, the telco can't really show me proof of half the things they're
billing me for either, since they don't exist.  In fact, I've confirmed
with the guys running the switches that I only have the number of PVCs
I thought I had.  The telco is still billing me for n+2 PVCs.

I agree with you that ISPs are nowhere near ready to do rock-solid
usage billing.  My point was that the Telcos aren't either.  Let's
not drag ISP service down to the level of customer service that is
provided by Telcos, PLEASE.

Owen

On 08/28/98 01:14:36 PM owen wrote:




NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please NOT that!!!  I've spent the last 6 months trying to get my
home phone bill straightened out with MCI and PacBell has been
overbilling me for PVC's on my Frame Relay for 18 months.

Please, let's not drop the internet to the level of service we all
complain about from the Telcos.

well alright, they're not perfect but i seriously doubt that if an isp
customer (anyone's customer) disputed pulling down a 1.5M .zip file
sometime last month as part of their overall usage sensative bill that said
isp could show the customer proof in the log files or captured packet
traces.  my only point was that we have a long way to go on the isp side.

and if i'm wrong, i'd appreciate pointers to any rock-solid billing
software out there.

-brett





Current thread: