nanog mailing list archives
Re: BBN/GTEI
From: Paul Vixie <paul () vix com>
Date: 21 Aug 1998 12:36:10 -0700
web () typo org (Wayne Bouchard) writes:
IMO, asymetry is not a valid requirement for a private interconnect. NOT having the interconnect hurts both companies.
it hurts them asymmetrically though. or, that's the bet at any rate. regardless of whatever we all charge or pay that's measured in bits per second per month or whatever, the costs are all in terms of bit- miles. ultimately this means you can only peer with someone whose costs are similar to yours, almost regardless of the benefit they receive from peering with you. -- Paul Vixie La Honda, CA "Many NANOG members have been around <paul () vix com> longer than most." --Jim Fleming pacbell!vixie!paul (An H.323 GateKeeper for the IPv8 Network)
Current thread:
- There's no substitute for value, was Re: BBN/GTEI, (continued)
- There's no substitute for value, was Re: BBN/GTEI John R. Levine (Aug 25)
- RE: BBN/GTEI Owen DeLong (Aug 22)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Owen DeLong (Aug 22)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Michael Dillon (Aug 22)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Alan Barrett (Aug 24)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Michael Dillon (Aug 22)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Owen DeLong (Aug 23)
- RE: BBN/GTEI Goodwin, Dustin (Aug 24)
- RE: BBN/GTEI Michael Dillon (Aug 21)
- RE: BBN/GTEI Charles Sprickman (Aug 21)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Wayne Bouchard (Aug 21)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Paul Vixie (Aug 21)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Michael Dillon (Aug 21)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Karl Denninger (Aug 21)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Michael Dillon (Aug 21)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Karl Denninger (Aug 21)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Michael Dillon (Aug 21)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Karl Denninger (Aug 21)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Tuomas Toivonen (Aug 27)
- RE: BBN/GTEI - Optical Internet solves asymmetric data flows Bill St. Arnaud (Aug 26)
- RE: BBN/GTEI Michael Dillon (Aug 21)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Deepak Jain (Aug 25)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Robert Bowman (Aug 25)