nanog mailing list archives

Re: spare swamp space?


From: Alex Bligh <amb () gxn net>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 23:51:09 +0100

Jeff,

Sorry I thought you were talking about router load.

Yeah, if you discard at the end of your upstream provider's link, then
that link will get saturated if you are smurfed enough. Last time we
had a really bad one, we were looking at 6-10Mb/s which was not enough
to saturate transit DS-3s, but enough to saturate a few bits of internal
network (us international providers have the odd small line here and
there). Obviously the further upstream you put it the better.

One of the problems here is lack of interest from peers and upstreams. If
you catch their interest at sales time rather than at abuse time
(i.e. you configure something similar into their router on setup),
that would be optimal.

Alex Bligh
GX Networks (formerly Xara Networks)
That's Odd,  because with my experience with it, the destination (for example,
irc.lightning.net) gets the committed access rate you set, however, the pipes are
still flooded and connectivity to the outside world is poor to nil.  You would still
have to agree that by having the upstream providors set the rate-limits is the safest
and most effective interim solution until something can be done permanently about
this oh so wonderful attack :-)

Alex Bligh wrote:

My limited experience is that if you run CEF on the interface concerned,
life is bearable. If you don't, it isn't. If you run < 11.1.17?? CA
where fast discards and routes to null0 were introduced, life is
disastrous.

Alex Bligh
GX Networks (formerly Xara Networks)



Alex Bligh wrote:

servers, one for the outside world and one for our customers only.  The
public server will be connected via a T1 to a smurf tracing friendly
transit provider for external connectivity.  This T1 will be used for this

OK, tell me where this falls down. Set up two IP addresses for your
IRC server on the same machine. On the router upstream from the machine,
allow only your customers to connect to one IP address, and anyone else
to connect to the other IP. Now go to your border routers, enable CEF
and configure something like:

! impose limits
access-list 100 permit ip any host public-irc.my.net
access-list 100 permit ip any host public-irc.my.net
access-list 101 deny ip any host private-irc.my.net
! i/f config for borders
interface myinterface
 ip access-group 101 in
 rate-limit input access-group 102 512000 512000 512000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop

Effectively this means that if your public IP gets smurfed, it's b/w
usage internally on your network is limited. If your private IP gets
smurfed, it all gets dropped (thinking about it if you made exceptions
for IRC peering you could do the whole thing on one IP if your customers
never use border router i/fs).

If you are paying per bit, you'll still pay for smurfs, but they'll have
to be 45Mb/s in size to cause any real damage. You'll probably find BGP
flapping up and down as your T1 saturates is more of a problem.

--
Alex Bligh
GX Networks (formerly Xara Networks)



--
                              \\|//
                             -(@ @)-
==========================oOO==(_)==OOo=================================
Steven Nash                            uin: 9021398
Cisco Certified Design Specialist       em: snash () lightning net
Network Engineer
Lightning Internet Services LLC
http://www.lightning.net
-=+===================================================================+-






--
                              \\|//
                             -(@ @)-
==========================oOO==(_)==OOo=================================
Steven Nash                            uin: 9021398
Cisco Certified Design Specialist       em: snash () lightning net
Network Engineer
Lightning Internet Services LLC
http://www.lightning.net
-=+===================================================================+-







Current thread: