nanog mailing list archives
Re: BBN Peering issues
From: jzeeff () verio net (Jon Zeeff)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 16:33:28 -0400 (EDT)
While byte flow is important for economic reasons (who carries the traffic how far), number of tcp connections and % would be better for measuring the number of customers that will be effected.
I am referring to output of Exodus traffic relative to input of BBN traffic,
Current thread:
- Re: BBN Peering issues, (continued)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Robert Bowman (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Dan Ritter (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Robert Bowman (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Forrest W. Christian (Aug 15)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Michael Shields (Aug 15)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Karl Denninger (Aug 15)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Mark Tripod (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Michael Shields (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Todd 'Mr Vendor Relations' Nagengast (Aug 16)
- Message not available
- Re: BBN Peering issues Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Jon Zeeff (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Re: BBN Peering issues Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues alex (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues David Greenman (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues alex (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues - FCC Notice of Inquiry on subject Nick Lordi (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues - FCC Notice of Inquiry on subject Michael Dillon (Aug 12)