nanog mailing list archives
Re: Network Operators and smurf
From: Havard.Eidnes () runit sintef no
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 1998 18:51:47 +0200
The other extreme is that, what if you are singly-homed? Then it is useless again.
Why, may I ask? This removes the need to maintain access lists to do the same thing, so I don't see it as entirely useless. - Håvard
Current thread:
- Re: Network Operators and smurf, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Network Operators and smurf Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 24)
- Re: Network Operators and smurf Dean Anderson (Apr 24)
- Re: Network Operators and smurf Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 24)
- Re: Network Operators and smurf Christopher Neill (Apr 26)
- Re: Network Operators and smurf Robert Sanders (Apr 26)
- Re: Network Operators and smurf Phil Howard (Apr 26)
- Re: Network Operators and smurf Havard . Eidnes (Apr 25)
- Re: Network Operators and smurf Al Reuben (Apr 25)
- Re: Network Operators and smurf Havard . Eidnes (Apr 25)
- Re: Network Operators and smurf Al Reuben (Apr 25)
- Re: Network Operators and smurf Havard . Eidnes (Apr 25)
- Re: Network Operators and smurf Al Reuben (Apr 25)
- Re: Network Operators and smurf Havard . Eidnes (Apr 25)
- Re: Network Operators and smurf Phil Howard (Apr 26)
- Re: Network Operators and smurf Phil Howard (Apr 26)
- Re: Network Operators and smurf Brian Holt (Apr 25)
- Re: Network Operators and smurf Alex P. Rudnev (Apr 27)
- RE: Network Operators and smurf barton (Apr 25)
- RE: Network Operators and smurf Craig A. Huegen (Apr 26)