nanog mailing list archives
Re: SMURF amplifier block list
From: Michael Dillon <michael () memra com>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 08:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
On Sun, 12 Apr 1998, Alex P. Rudnev wrote:
May be, someone will maintain such lists? First, it allow to fix smurf source by 'log' option in the CISCO list; second, it'll prefere some attacks.
If Karl will supply us the IP address of a non-critical machine in his network then we only need one list maintained. Anyone can then add new networks to Karl's list simply by smurfing his non-critical machine and it will still meet his criteria of a verified atack. -- Michael Dillon - Internet & ISP Consulting http://www.memra.com - E-mail: michael () memra com
Current thread:
- SMURF amplifier block list Karl Denninger (Apr 11)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Al Reuben (Apr 11)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Karl Denninger (Apr 11)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Jon Lewis (Apr 11)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Karl Denninger (Apr 11)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Marc Slemko (Apr 11)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Karl Denninger (Apr 11)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Al Reuben (Apr 11)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Michael Dillon (Apr 12)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Alex P. Rudnev (Apr 12)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Craig A. Huegen (Apr 12)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Karl Denninger (Apr 12)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Michael Dillon (Apr 12)