nanog mailing list archives
Re: LSR and packet filters
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 97 17:45 PDT
traceroute -g is the _only_ useful application for LSR. Disabling LSR and adding an application level service for tracing back would be just as useful.
Vadim. I am just a stoopid operator with a network to run. I am not at all cheered by trading a tool that works for a theory that could be designed and implemented some day. Until inter-NOC operation is facile, we have few tools for debugging inter- provider routing problems. So we use what we have although we realize that they have flaws. Not to discourage you and others from developing better tools. Please! randy
Current thread:
- Re: LSR and packet filters Vadim Antonov (Sep 13)
- Re: LSR and packet filters Randy Bush (Sep 13)
- Re: LSR and packet filters Alex "Mr. Worf" Yuriev (Sep 13)
- Re: LSR and packet filters Randy Bush (Sep 19)
- Re: LSR and packet filters Alex "Mr. Worf" Yuriev (Sep 13)
- Re: LSR and packet filters Sean M. Doran (Sep 14)
- Re: LSR and packet filters Vadim Antonov (Sep 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: LSR and packet filters Hank Nussbacher (Sep 14)
- Re: LSR and packet filters Alex "Mr. Worf" Yuriev (Sep 14)
- Re: LSR and packet filters Bill Manning (Sep 14)
- Re: LSR and packet filters Alex "Mr. Worf" Yuriev (Sep 14)
- Re: LSR and packet filters Randy Bush (Sep 13)