RE: Advisory - tunneling of IP at exchange points.

[Dave Van Allen <dave () fast net>]

Hi, Craig,  that's all been done, cisco verified the troubles and
anomalies here on-site, all info has been transmitted to them now for
months. The BUGid description is worded incorrectly as I said, so you
can't really glean meaningful info from just the description.  I opened
that ticket and it has been very frustrating indeed. You're right, it's
a valuable tool however it is verifiably broken in certain instances. I
was just cautioning anyone who needed to count on it.

Happy holidays!

Best regards,

David Van Allen - FASTNET(tm) / You Tools Corporation
dave () fast net (888)321-FAST(3278) http://www.fast.net
FASTNET - Business and Personal Internet Solutions



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Craig A. Huegen [SMTP:chuegen () quadrunner com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 1997 10:35 AM
> To:   Dave Van Allen
> Cc:   'Paul Thornton'; nanog () merit edu
> Subject:      RE: Advisory - tunneling of IP at exchange points.
>
> On Wed, 26 Nov 1997, Dave Van Allen wrote:
>
> ==>We find log-input to very unreliable and often producing wrong
> ==>information. It indeed operates differently across the 11.1 train
> (no
> ==>comment on 11.2 offered) I think 11.1.15 breaks it badly. Albeit
> ==>improperly worded and not well defined in print on CCO, please
> reference
> ==>cisco BUGid CSCdj40503 prior to trusting log-input for any valid
> info. 
>
> CSCdj40503 simply fixes a problem where packets are not logged under
> certain conditions.  It doesn't change any information.
>
> I've never seen a problem with log-input reporting bad information; if
> you
> have and can reproduce, please document and contact your normal
> support
> channels to fix this valuable tool.
>
> /cah