nanog mailing list archives
RE: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death
From: Darin Fisher <oz () axent com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 15:05:00 -0700
Other vulnerabilities: Cisco PIX NOT vulnerable Wellfleet NOT vulnerable NPI EIFO vulnerable (doesn't shut the system down, but you can no longer monitor from telnet) IRIX 5.3 vulnerable IRIX 6.4 NOT vulnerable SunOS 4.1.3 vulnerable Solaris 2.4 NOT vulnerable Solaris 2.5.1 NOT vulnerable Ultrix (all) vulnerable HPUX 9.x vulnerable HPUX 10.x NOT vulnerable AIX 3.2.5 NOT vulnerable AIX 4.1 NOT vulnerable WinNT (w/ service pack 3) a little vulnerable (slows the system 'till SYN timeout) Win95 (w/ service pack 1) NOT vulnerable ( NCDware 3.3.2 vulnerable Linux 2.0.30 NOT vulnerable Novell 3.11 NOT vulneralbe Novell 3.12 NOT vulnerable Novell 4.10 NOT vulnerable Motorola SVR5 3.0 NOT vulnerable
-----Original Message----- From: Michael Behrens [SMTP:michael () gothmog kingston net] Sent: Friday, November 21, 1997 12:51 PM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death On Fri, 21 Nov 1997, Stan Barber wrote:BugTraq has a note that version 10.3(7) is vunerable. I don't knowwhichversion of Cisco the IOS was running on.version 11.1(5) is vulnerable. Michael |InterNet Kingston #177 Wellington St. Ste #302| |Kingston, Ontario K7L3E3, Canada | |http://www.kingston.net Bigger, Better, Local |
Current thread:
- Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death, (continued)
- Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death Nathan Bates (Nov 25)
- Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death Karl Denninger (Nov 21)
- Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death blast (Nov 21)
- Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death John Hawkinson (Nov 21)
- Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death Alex Rubenstein (Nov 21)
- Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death Avi Freedman (Nov 21)
- Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death Michael Behrens (Nov 21)