nanog mailing list archives
RE: IPv8 < IPv6
From: Jim Fleming <JimFleming () doorstep unety net>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 01:11:11 -0600
Bradley Reynolds[SMTP:brad () b63695 student cwru edu] wrote: <snip> @ @Granted, there will be an administrative hierarchy no @matter how you structure addresses, but I would rather that the @consumer decides who is going to administer the tiers @of such a hierarchy instead of leaving that decision @to the protocol fairy. @ I suggest that you use IPv6... http://www.6bone.net/6bone-testv2-address.txt http://www.6bone.net/6bone-testv2-addr-usage.html Jim Fleming Unir Corporation IBC, Tortola, BVI
Current thread:
- Re: IPv8 < IPv6, (continued)
- Re: IPv8 < IPv6 Paul Ferguson (Nov 06)
- Re: IPv8 < IPv6 Richard Irving (Nov 06)
- Re: IPv8 < IPv6 Paul Ferguson (Nov 06)
- Re: IPv8 < IPv6 Alan Hannan (Nov 06)
- Re: IPv8 < IPv6 Alan Hannan (Nov 06)
- Geographic v. topological address allocation [Was: Re: IPv8 < IPv6] Paul Ferguson (Nov 06)
- Re: Geographic v. topological address allocation [Was: Re: IPv8 < IPv6] Alan Hannan (Nov 06)
- Re: Geographic v. topological address allocation [Was: Re: IPv8 < IPv6] Paul Ferguson (Nov 06)