nanog mailing list archives
Re: IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker () brandenburg com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 09:58:32 -0700
At 8:10 AM -0700 5/30/97, Vince Wolodkin wrote:
dual standard where you say NSI is a government contractor and should therefore be gone in 1998(you don't like NSI), but you turn around and even though IANA is a part of the SAME contract you want THEM to stay,
NSI inherited a simple, specific administration activity. IANA sets policy. NSI actions are directed by agreement with IANA and NSF. IANA actions are directed by general community consensus. Different scope. Different reporting structure. NSI is narrow. IANA is broad. NSI is clerical. IANA is policy. Thank you for playing. d/ -------------------- Dave Crocker +1 408 246 8253 Brandenburg Consulting fax: +1 408 249 6205 675 Spruce Dr. dcrocker () brandenburg com Sunnyvale CA 94086 USA http://www.brandenburg.com Internet Mail Consortium http://www.imc.org, info () imc org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't Richard J. Sexton (May 29)
- Re: IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't Paul A Vixie (May 29)
- Re: IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't Susan R. Harris (May 30)
- Re: IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't Vince Wolodkin (May 30)
- Re: IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't Perry E. Metzger (May 30)
- Re: IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't Vince Wolodkin (May 30)
- Re: IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't David R. Conrad (May 30)
- Re: IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't Dave Crocker (May 30)
- does the IANA exist Perry E. Metzger (May 30)
- Re: IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't Paul A Vixie (May 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't Sean M. Doran (May 30)