nanog mailing list archives

Re: IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't


From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker () brandenburg com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 09:58:32 -0700

At 8:10 AM -0700 5/30/97, Vince Wolodkin wrote:
dual standard where you say NSI is a government contractor and should
therefore be gone in 1998(you don't like NSI), but you turn around and
even though IANA is a part of the SAME contract you want THEM to stay,

        NSI inherited a simple, specific administration activity.  IANA
sets policy.  NSI actions are directed by agreement with IANA and NSF.
IANA actions are directed by general community consensus.

        Different scope.  Different reporting structure.  NSI is narrow.
IANA is broad.  NSI is clerical.  IANA is policy.

        Thank you for playing.

d/

--------------------
Dave Crocker                                             +1 408 246 8253
Brandenburg Consulting                              fax: +1 408 249 6205
675 Spruce Dr.                                  dcrocker () brandenburg com
Sunnyvale CA 94086 USA                        http://www.brandenburg.com

Internet Mail Consortium                http://www.imc.org, info () imc org


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: