Re: uDNS Root Name Servers Taking Shape

[John Charles Broomfield <jbroom () outremer com>]

At 20:01 29/05/97 -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
(...)
> You mean you, and the others, can't qualify under the rules of *stable,
> business grade service*, defined as:
>
> 1)     Someone answers your phone.
> 2)     You are actually registered to legally do business in your state.
> 3)     You have real nameservers on real circuits.
> 4)     Someone can actually register electronically in your TLD.
> 5)     Someone can use the web and/or whois to look up who owns a SLD
>       delegation.
(...)
> Ron, all you have to do is file the template.  I know that's tough, but the
> truth of the matter is that 90% of the TLDs which your defectors are now
> putting up under "uDNS" don't meet the above *FOUR* criteria, say much less
> being non-collusive and holding 10 or fewer TLDs.

[puzzled look as he looks at his hands and tries to count fingers...]
There's something here I'm missing I think.
Karl, you *are* the technical wizard in eDNS (or whatever you're merged into
now), aren't you?
Never mind.
John.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -