nanog mailing list archives

RE: UUNET Pulling Peering Agreements & replacing them with charging under non-disclosure?


From: Gordon Cook <cook () netaxs com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 23:51:06 -0400 (EDT)

when they clean out all the competing backbones what is to prevent thenm
from doubling and then tripling your charges Dave?

************************************************************************
The COOK Report on Internet               For subsc. pricing & more than
431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA     ten megabytes of free material
(609) 882-2572 (phone & fax)              visit   http://cookreport.com/
Internet: cook () cookreport com             On line speech of critics under
attack by Ewing NJ School Board, go to http://cookreport.com/sboard.shtml
************************************************************************


On Fri, 2 May 1997, Dave Van Allen wrote:

Well said!

Gee, you mean that this *is* really a business??

Best regards,

David Van Allen - You Tools Corporation / FASTNET(tm)
dave () fast net (610) 289-1100  http://www.fast.net
FASTNET - PA/NJ/DE Internet Solutions

-----Original Message-----
From:        Stephen Balbach [SMTP:stephen () clark net]
Sent:        Friday, May 02, 1997 6:43 AM
To:  Gordon Cook
Cc:  nanog () merit edu; inet-access () earth com; dave () oldcolo com
Subject:     Re: UUNET Pulling Peering Agreements & replacing them with charging
under non-disclosure?


First it was AGIS (but who cares about AGIS?). Now UUNET. Tomorrow who?
MCI? As UUNET and others of the big five move to consolidate their
markets.......... let UUNET put the smaller national backbones against the
wall and whom do the rest of ISP's have to rely on?   Those ISPs who did
not get hit in UUNET's first round of cuts. Will you get it in the neck in
the second or the third round?

The only thing UUNET is cutting is Internet trees, and there are some who 
are protesting by hugging them. Clear out the chaff for next seasons 
crops. 

Buying connectivity from an ISP who peers with UUNET, or buying direct
from UUNET, is a lot cheaper then building a national DS-3/OC-3 backbone
and trying to be default free - this is not about UUNET cuting throats,
it's about large and small ISP's examining thier business model. 


.stb



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: