nanog mailing list archives

Re: Changing the Rules...


From: Marc Hurst <mhurst () fastlane ca>
Date: Thu, 22 May 1997 08:24:52 -0400 (EDT)



On Thu, 22 May 1997, Philip J. Nesser II wrote:

Marc Hurst supposedly said:


On Thu, 22 May 1997, Perry E. Metzger wrote:

Duane Little writes:
Gee, this sort of thing looks a lot like the routine abuse of position
and authority which is the usual result of a monopoly.

The monopoly in this case?  --- IANA.

The government of Hati sent Jon Postel a request that the .HT domain
be reassigned. The wishes of the government were followed. Is it your
contention that the wishes of the Hatian government should NOT have
been followed? Can you give us a basis in international law that makes
you think Jon is in a position to deny the request of a sovereign
state? Do you think the U.S. State Department would be pleased with
Jon if he were to decide arbitrarily to assign any ISO-3166 TLD
against the wishes of the government of that country?

SKYSCAPE had offered IANA/Jon Postel to fund the ".ca" domain at no 
cost and no prejudice based on the premise and understanding that the 
Canadian government had stopped funding the project. SKYSCAPE was willing 
to fund the existing infrastructure as is (our cost).





So?  As soon as the Canadian Government directs the IANA to delegate  ".ca"
to Skyscape I am sure the IANA will change the delegation.  Your statement
has no relevance to this discussion.  


The Canadian government had zero input in the selection of the University 
of British Columbia having this authority. Jon Postel told us when we 
asked that as long as John Demco is in that office he will have the registry.

Might I add that there are other ca-domain board members who 
indiscriminately charge for registering in "free" domain space...

The converstion is about sovereignty you fool...



---> Phil

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: