nanog mailing list archives
Re: Root Nameserver Changes
From: Marc Hurst <mhurst () fastlane ca>
Date: Tue, 20 May 1997 13:58:37 -0400 (EDT)
Because you do not belong to one does not mean they do not exist. Market share, or the lack thereof, does not dictate as to whether or not they actually exist. On Tue, 20 May 1997, Paul A Vixie wrote:
It is better to expand/modify Root Name Server Confederations based on where servers are located and which ISPs use them.there is no such thing as a root name server confederation, that is a fiction of jim fleming's intersteller imagination.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- RE: Root Nameserver Changes Jim Fleming (May 20)
- Re: Root Nameserver Changes Paul A Vixie (May 20)
- Re: Root Nameserver Changes Marc Hurst (May 20)
- Re: Root Nameserver Changes Jim Dixon (May 20)
- Re: Root Nameserver Changes Perry E. Metzger (May 20)
- Re: Root Nameserver Changes George Herbert (May 20)
- Re: Root Nameserver Changes Marc Hurst (May 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Root Nameserver Changes James R. Fisher (May 20)
- RE: Root Nameserver Changes Peter Galbavy (May 20)
- RE: Root Nameserver Changes Jim Fleming (May 20)
- Re: Root Nameserver Changes Paul A Vixie (May 20)