nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Big Squeeze
From: Sean Donelan <SEAN () SDG DRA COM>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 22:30:51 -0600 (CST)
Computational power required for a route flap is not the issue here. Many people have stated that, statistically longer prefixes flap more. Unfortunately, they have then said that because of this shorter prefixes should have looser dampening parameters put on them, when what they really meant was that the longer prefixes should have more strict dampening parameters put on them. Yes it is exactly the same thing, but it is an important semantic distinction. If a group of prefixes categorized by a its length tends to flap more than the average, then said group should have more strict dampening parameters placed on it.
Statistics are soo much fun.
Current thread:
- Re: The Big Squeeze, (continued)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Randy Bush (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Alan Barrett (Mar 03)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Erik Sherk (Mar 03)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Alec H. Peterson (Mar 03)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Avi Freedman (Mar 03)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Randy Bush (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Bradley Dunn (Mar 03)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Peter Galbavy (Mar 04)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Tony Barber (Mar 04)