nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAPs - Temperature vs Packet loss
From: Michael Dillon <michael () memra com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 14:03:51 -0800 (PST)
On Fri, 28 Mar 1997, Darren Kerr wrote:
Boone Boulevard MAE-East is currently running very hot. Intake temp on our router has been up to 40 degrees today, and output at 70.
70 degrees!!! This is pushing the limit for reliable operation of electronic equipment. I know I have frequently solved problems with all sorts of equipment (computers, modems, terminal servers, routers) by dropping the ambient room temperature to below the level where it is comfortable for people to work, i.e. around 15 degrees. or by adding fans internally or externally. I think that ambient temperatures at the tops of the racks and at the room's outflow vents should be specified in IXP agreements along with a protocol for dealing with this kind of problem. And most especially, this needs to be properly engineered from the start. Michael Dillon - Internet & ISP Consulting Memra Software Inc. - Fax: +1-250-546-3049 http://www.memra.com - E-mail: michael () memra com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- NAPs - Temperature vs Packet loss Alex.Bligh (Mar 28)
- Re: NAPs - Temperature vs Packet loss Darren Kerr (Mar 28)
- Re: NAPs - Temperature vs Packet loss Michael Dillon (Mar 28)
- Re: NAPs - Temperature vs Packet loss Nathan Stratton (Mar 28)
- Re: NAPs - Temperature vs Packet loss Michael Dillon (Mar 28)
- Re: NAPs - Temperature vs Packet loss Brian Horvitz (Mar 29)
- Re: NAPs - Temperature vs Packet loss Darren Kerr (Mar 28)