nanog mailing list archives
RE: Domain Rant.
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 10:23:57 -0400
I would be very interested. Is anybody interested in starting a talk about this? At 07:46 AM 3/21/97 -0700, Jerry Eyers wrote:
Not necessarily a massive cooperation of everyone. but at least a few. Seems to me you could find some folks would be interested in approaching that. Jerry Jerry Eyers U Psalms 46:1---------- From: Alex Rubenstein[SMTP:alex () nac net] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 1997 7:47 PM To: Karl Denninger Cc: Paul A Vixie; nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Domain Rant.Because there can be only one authority for ".".I don't agree with this. It is quite possible for everyone to maintain ".". Then, there would be no need for root domain servers; HOWEVER, this would take massive cooperation throughout the industy, which will never happen.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Domain Rant. [re: should be in iahc list if it existed], (continued)
- Re: Domain Rant. [re: should be in iahc list if it existed] Tim Gibson (Mar 21)
- Re: Domain Rant. [re: should be in iahc list if it existed] Paul A Vixie (Mar 21)
- Re: Domain Rant. [re: should be in iahc list if it existed] Karl Denninger (Mar 21)
- root-server envy, racketeering, and black helicopters. Wayne D. Correia (Mar 21)
- Message not available
- Re: root-server envy, racketeering, and black helicopters. Gregory Hersh (Mar 21)
- Re: root-server envy, racketeering, and black helicopters. Hong Chen (Mar 21)
- Re: Domain Rant. Joe McDonald (Mar 21)
- Re: Domain Rant. Steve Kann (Mar 21)
- Re: Domain Rant. Michael Dillon (Mar 21)
- Re: Domain Rant. Perry E. Metzger (Mar 21)