nanog mailing list archives
Re: Domain Rant.
From: Sanjay Dani(maillists) <indus () professionals com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 1997 23:09:14 -0800 (PST)
Seems to me that somebody has to pay for the service and I'd rather pay for it myself rather than have the U.S. taxpayer foot the bill. Note that I am NOT a U.S. taxpayer, not yet anyway. But that saying about no taxation without representation cuts both ways. I'm quite happy to see the tax money, and therefore the U.S. government, out of the loop.
Inferencing the US govt. is out of the loop is a logical leap of faith. Tell me who owns the "." and why wouldn't the Feds of some denomination step in to "stabilize" the namespace. In other words, why would they risk such a valuable resource, built in the past with US taxpayer money, walk away to a potentially non-US private enterprise or a consortium. I'm just pointing out one more plausible outcome, not meaning to argue. Regards, Sanjay. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Domain Rant. Len Rose (Mar 19)
- Re: Domain Rant. Dave Crocker (Mar 19)
- Re: Domain Rant. Randy Bush (Mar 19)
- Re: Domain Rant. Michael Dillon (Mar 19)
- Re: Domain Rant. repstein (Mar 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Domain Rant. Len Rose (Mar 19)
- Re: Domain Rant. Randy Bush (Mar 19)
- Re: Domain Rant. Len Rose (Mar 19)
- Re: Domain Rant. Randy Bush (Mar 19)
- Re: Domain Rant. Matthew Kaufman (Mar 19)
- Re: Domain Rant. maillists (Mar 19)
- Re: Domain Rant. Michael Dillon (Mar 20)
- Re: Domain Rant. Brian Tackett (Mar 20)
- Re: Domain Rant. Mark Borchers (Mar 20)
- Re: Domain Rant. Dirk Harms-Merbitz (Mar 20)
- Re: Domain Rant. NetSurfer (Mar 20)
- Re: Domain Rant. Paul R.D. Lantinga (Mar 20)
- Re: Domain Rant. Perry E. Metzger (Mar 20)
- Re: Domain Rant. Paul A Vixie (Mar 20)
- Re: Domain Rant. George Herbert (Mar 20)
- Re: Domain Rant. Michael Dillon (Mar 20)
(Thread continues...)