nanog mailing list archives

Re: The Big Squeeze


From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 1997 11:46:58 -0500

At 11:33 AM 3/2/97 -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:


Que sera, sera. Renumbering is a fact of life.

See: RFC1900, RFC2008, RFC2071.


Never said it wasn't a fact a life, just that it's a painful
one... And a disruptive one. Imagine the heartburn if a group with
simply one ClassB was required to totally renumber to another...


I never meant to imply that it wasn't disliked and painful.

One also might suggest that address portability is very much dependent
on the prefix size and it's ability to aggregated (or not) elsewhere in
the global topology. Having said that, a /16 is generally considered
portable.

- paul

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: