nanog mailing list archives

IP Ownership and Domain Names


From: Jim Fleming <JimFleming () unety net>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 1997 17:22:03 -0600

On Sunday, March 09, 1997 9:56 PM, Steven M. Bellovin[SMTP:smb () research att com] wrote:
@ At 08:23 AM 3/10/97 +1000, Geoff Huston wrote:
@ >Of course this scenario breaks down quickly..
@ >
@ >Listed registrant A "sells" to B who "sells" to C who...
@ >
@ >Now the sucker who "buys" from C has the problem of tracing authenticity
@ >of the "title" C is selling. This is not easy, particularly if B is less
@ >than scrupulous and has "sold" title to a number of folk including
@ >C, or if C is unscrupulous and is "selling" without have concluded
@ >and transaction with B.
@ 
@ This can easily be solved in a number of ways.  For example, a public key
@ could be publicly associated with each address.  A transfer is accomplished
@ by signing a message to that effect.  Similarly -- and very importantly --
@ control over routing of that address is also governed by that
@ private/public key pair.  There's more to this protocol than I've
@ described, but it can be made to work.
@ 
@ 

You could also handle it just like "domain names"....

Does AT&T "own"....ATT.COM ?

Does AT&T "own"....

        12.IN-ADDR.ARPA ?
        and
        135.IN-ADDR.ARPA ?

How about...
        
        12.IP4.INT ?
        135.IP4.INT ?

are those registered....?

FL      12.0.0.0        AT&T ITS (NET-ATT)
FL      135.0.0.0       AT&T ITS (NET-ATT-135-0-0-0-B)






--
Jim Fleming
Unir Corporation

e-mail:
JimFleming () unety net
JimFleming@unety.s0.g0 (EDNS/IPv8)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: