nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Routing problem
From: Danny McPherson <danny () genuity net>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 1997 06:17:52 -0700
Hey, Ravi, I thought you fixed that bug? Perhaps AS4005 is not running the fixed code. Perhaps there's another bug.
it's not 'another' bug. (received only) means that soft-reconfiguration is configured for the peer and some policy denied the route so it's not being used - yet. had he did a "sh ip route x.x.x.x" rather than "sh ip bgp x.x.x.x" he would have seen the less specific entry being used. -danny
Current thread:
- BGP Routing problem Anthony Walker (Jun 05)
- Re: BGP Routing problem Bil Herd (Jun 05)
- Re: BGP Routing problem Alan Barrett (Jun 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: BGP Routing problem Danny McPherson (Jun 05)
- Re: BGP Routing problem Danny McPherson (Jun 06)
- Re: BGP Routing problem Alan Barrett (Jun 06)
- Re: BGP Routing problem John (Jun 06)
- Re: BGP Routing problem Alex.Bligh (Jun 06)
- Re: BGP Routing problem Ed Kern (Jun 06)
- Re: BGP Routing problem John (Jun 06)
- Re: BGP Routing problem Alan Barrett (Jun 06)
- Re: BGP Routing problem Marc Slemko (Jun 06)