nanog mailing list archives
Re: Unacceptable Delay
From: "Jeffrey S. Curtis" <curtis () anl gov>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 11:13:34 -0500
Rodney Joffe writes: }It's interesting to note the delay in the NANOG mailer. I don't know if }there's any manual operation involved, but according to the headers, Rob }posted this at 7:43, it was received at 7:43 pdt by MERIT, and shipped }out at 8:15 pdt. } }I guess we're lucky this isn't an operational list, where time might be }important ;-) } }Can we improve this? It depends where you are in the list. Given the large number of subscribers to this list, some will get the message earlier than others. For example, the message you're referring to which you received at 8:15 pdt, was received by me at 7:54 pdt - just 11 minutes after it was sent. I imagine people near the top of the mailing list got their copies much closer to 7:43 pdt. Jeff -- Jeffrey S. Curtis | Internetwork Manager Argonne National Laboratory | Email: curtis () anl gov 9700 South Cass Avenue, ECT-221 | Voice: 630/252-1789 Argonne, IL 60439 | Fax: 630/252-9689
Current thread:
- Re: Unacceptable Delay Jeffrey S. Curtis (Jul 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Unacceptable Delay Bill Woodcock (Jul 11)
- Unacceptable Delay Rodney Joffe (Jul 11)
- Re: Unacceptable Delay Eric D. Madison (Jul 11)
- Re: Unacceptable Delay Robert Bowman (Jul 11)
- Re: Unacceptable Delay Eric D. Madison (Jul 11)
- Re: Unacceptable Delay Brett D. Watson (Jul 11)
- Re: Unacceptable Delay Susan R. Harris (Jul 14)