nanog mailing list archives
Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Results
From: Jesse Caulfield <jesse () netthink com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 00:01:46 -0400 (EDT)
Grumble. This is really starting to grate. Wasn't the point of this ~study to find the best value for your dollar when buying leased lines? What exactly does putting web servers in your pop have to do with backbone performance. Furthermore, exactly how would you economically scale and support such a spaghetti operation? It seems to me the unintended goal of the study was to find access providers on whose networks web sites have a snappier "user experience". Am I the only one here who see this as measuring apples to judge oranges? Will someone please point me to the scientific method being used here, 'cause I sure as hell can't see it. -- JMC On Wed, 9 Jul 1997, Jack Rickard wrote:
"Cheating" is of course encouraged. This isn't an academic test at your local university. We're all out of school now. If you can figure out a way
Current thread:
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Results, (continued)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Results Robert Laughlin (Jul 08)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Results pete (Jul 08)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Results John Leong (Jul 09)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Results Avi Freedman (Jul 08)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Results Jack Rickard (Jul 09)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Results Craig A. Huegen (Jul 09)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Results Deepak Jain (Jul 09)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Results Alex.Bligh (Jul 09)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Results Craig A. Huegen (Jul 09)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Results James R Grinter (Jul 16)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Results Craig A. Huegen (Jul 09)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Results Robert Laughlin (Jul 08)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Results Jesse Caulfield (Jul 09)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Results Golan Ben-Oni (Jul 09)