nanog mailing list archives
Re: Film at 11:00
From: Tony Li <tli () jnx com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 1997 17:58:29 -0800 (PST)
tli or pferguso might be able to shed some light on the actual numbers, assuming he has the time and interest :) cisco might consider those numbers a trade secret, so I'll decline. I'll simply point out that yours truly worked quite hard at conserving memory. As you correctly point out, there is indeed the inevitable time space tradeoff, and so some memory inefficiency is inevitable as there's only a finite amount of time (always insufficient, natch ;-). You might also recall that there's forwarding table, the cache, and then the SSE data structures. BGP is very efficient as a whole. The problem is that it's just a big messy problem. Tony - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Film at 11:00, (continued)
- Re: Film at 11:00 Tony Li (Jan 01)
- Re: Film at 11:00 alex (Jan 03)
- Re: Film at 11:00 Avi Freedman (Jan 03)
- Re: Film at 11:00 alex (Jan 03)
- Re: Film at 11:00 Jonathan Heiliger (Jan 03)
- Re: Film at 11:00 Ravi Chandra (Jan 04)
- Re: Film at 11:00 alex (Jan 03)
- Re: Film at 11:00 Tony Li (Jan 03)
- Re: Film at 11:00 Ravi Chandra (Jan 04)
- Re: Film at 11:00 Tony Li (Jan 01)
- Re: Film at 11:00 Avi Freedman (Jan 01)
- Re: Film at 11:00 Tony Li (Jan 01)
- Re: Film at 11:00 Tony Li (Jan 01)
- Re: Film at 11:00 Tony Li (Jan 02)