nanog mailing list archives
Re: peering charges?
From: Paul A Vixie <paul () vix com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 09:08:56 -0800
Large ISPs should probably be interested in access to content, without it their users could find the Internet a very boring place.Not only that. They are also interested in peer's customer population gaining access to content (and ads) published by their own customers.
In other words there is a lot more money to be made by peering openly and having excellent crossbar-like connectivity through a lot of peering points than by worrying about ways that peering with you enables your competitors to sell more circuits. I have heard that there may be a panel debate on this subject at the upcoming NANOG meeting. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: peering charges?, (continued)
- Re: peering charges? Jon Zeeff (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Paul A Vixie (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? John (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Jon Zeeff (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Alex.Bligh (Jan 28)
- Re: peering charges? Jeff Young (Jan 29)
- Re: peering charges? John (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Paul A Vixie (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Jonathan Heiliger (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Todd Graham Lewis (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Daryn D. Fisher (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Dirk Harms-Merbitz (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Michael Dillon (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Dirk Harms-Merbitz (Jan 26)