nanog mailing list archives
Re: peering charges?
From: Jonathan Heiliger <loco () isi net>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 00:11:44 -0800 (PST)
On Sat, 25 Jan 1997, Vadim Antonov wrote: |} There are no settlements because traffic has little relevance to |} relative worth of connectivity from one provider to another. The large |} ISPs are generally interested in market share or peers, not in volume |} of mutual traffic. Large ISPs should probably be interested in access to content, without it their users could find the Internet a very boring place. -jh- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- peering charges? Dave Curado (Jan 25)
- Re: peering charges? Mike Leber (Jan 25)
- Re: peering charges? Eric D. Madison (Jan 25)
- Re: peering charges? Howard C. Berkowitz (Jan 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: peering charges? Vadim Antonov (Jan 25)
- Re: peering charges? Avi Freedman (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Jonathan Heiliger (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Nathan Stratton (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Avi Freedman (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Alec H. Peterson (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Paul A Vixie (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Pushpendra Mohta (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Nathan Stratton (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Paul A Vixie (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Jeff Young (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? John (Jan 27)