nanog mailing list archives
Re: operational problems at mae-west?
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () pluris com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1997 15:18:53 -0800
There's a hack around it (not pretty...) -- use physically different LAN to propagate routing updates, with NEXT-HOPs pointing to the "data LAN" interfaces. The problem with that solution is that if data LAN fails, there's no way to learn about it at BGP level. That is due to the unfortunate property of BGP (and many other routing protocols) that it uses the same transport to propagate keepalives and routing updates. --vadim
i wasnt' aware that bgp keepalives had a queuiing priority... or are you talking about spd?Yes, SPD.
SPD (IP precedence) will not affect the prioritzation that the gigaswitch applies (which is no prioritization). --jhawk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: operational problems at mae-west?, (continued)
- Re: operational problems at mae-west? Robert Laughlin (Jan 24)
- Re: operational problems at mae-west? Stephen Balbach (Jan 24)
- Re: operational problems at mae-west? Robert Laughlin (Jan 24)
- Re: operational problems at mae-west? Brett D. Watson (Jan 24)
- Re: operational problems at mae-west? Steve Feldman (Jan 24)
- Re: operational problems at mae-west? Paul Ferguson (Jan 24)
- Re: operational problems at mae-west? John Hawkinson (Jan 24)
- Re: operational problems at mae-west? Jim Rowh (Jan 24)
- Re: operational problems at mae-west? Brett D. Watson (Jan 24)
- Re: operational problems at mae-west? maillists (Jan 24)
- Re: operational problems at mae-west? Steve Davis (Jan 24)
- Re: operational problems at mae-west? Vadim Antonov (Jan 24)
- Re: operational problems at mae-west? Paul Ferguson (Jan 25)
- Re: operational problems at mae-west? Paul Ferguson (Jan 25)
- Re: operational problems at mae-west? Brett D. Watson (Jan 25)
- Re: operational problems at mae-west? Paul Ferguson (Jan 25)