nanog mailing list archives
Re: Bay Networks in bed with commie censors?
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () pluris com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 22:04:19 -0800
Ah, finally. Somebody from Bay. Do you care about an official statement clarifying the story?
What makes you all think that we were the only people competing for this business?
I have no way to know that. I know people who refused business in similar situations.
Do you think that if we did not win that our competitors would not have trumpeted their accomplishments?
They'd better anticipate the potential for negative publicity? --vadim - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Bay Networks in bed with commie censors?, (continued)
- Re: Bay Networks in bed with commie censors? Jon Green (Jan 15)
- Re: Bay Networks in bed with commie censors? Vadim Antonov (Jan 15)
- Re: Bay Networks in bed with commie censors? Tony Li (Jan 15)
- Re: Bay Networks in bed with commie censors? William Allen Simpson (Jan 15)
- Re: Bay Networks in bed with commie censors? Vadim Antonov (Jan 18)
- Re: Bay Networks in bed with commie censors? Ehud Gavron (Jan 18)
- Re: Bay Networks in bed with commie censors? root (Jan 18)
- Re: Bay Networks in bed with commie censors? Gordon Frank (Jan 20)
- Re: Bay Networks in bed with commie censors? Ehud Gavron (Jan 18)
- Re: [NANOG] Bay Networks in bed with commie censors? Jeffrey C. Ollie (Jan 18)
- Re: [NANOG] Bay Networks in bed with commie censors? Craig Nordin (Jan 19)
- Re: Bay Networks in bed with commie censors? Vadim Antonov (Jan 20)
- Re: Bay Networks in bed with commie censors? alex (Jan 21)