Re: RFC1918 conformance

[Tony Bates <tbates () cisco com>]

Right now it checks for:
         >= 64/8 && <= 127/8
         > 211/8 
         RFC1918 set of prefixes

                --Tony

 Andrew Partan <asp () partan com> writes:
  * > This would be good as I report each week in my report possible bogus
  * > routes but no one seems to care to filter (or fix this). Today it says:
  * 
  * Which routes to you consider to be bogons?
  *     --asp () partan com (Andrew Partan)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -