Re: Automatic filtering - CISCO, you should think about this...

["Alex P. Rudnev" <alex () Relcom EU net>]

> > cheap for the router to process, this would likely not seriously burden 
> > anyone in their direct connections.
> >
> > I'd love to see something like this, and it would reduce the complaint that
> > its "too hard to manage" such things.
>
> How about having "no-auto-inbound-filter" instead, making the default in all
> new versions of IOS be to run this essential level of protection, providing
> a means to turn it off only for those who know they need to turn it off.
It was proposed to CISCO about 1 year ago. But I have head they are doing 
something about this (through it's in private talks only).




> -- 
> Phil Howard | a6b5c8d2 () spam4mer org suck6it2 () no90ads4 org stop6ads () anyplace edu
>   phil      | w0x8y2z4 () nowhere5 edu stop5ads () anyplace org a3b4c7d6 () dumbads3 org
>     at      | ads6suck () spam0mer net end3ads1 () no95ads2 net stop1ads () noplace2 org
>   milepost  | end5it79 () no2where net die3spam () s0p0a4m7 net eat05me6 () dumbads3 org
>     dot     | end7ads9 () no52ads9 edu ads5suck () no9place net stop7074 () lame9ads edu
>   com       | no9spam1 () lame5ads org no94ads1 () no96ads0 net stop5ads () nowhere7 net

Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow
(+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 239-10-10, N 13729 (pager)
(+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax)