nanog mailing list archives
Re: handling large numbers of EBGP peers
From: rob () rjl com
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 09:05:16 -0800
It's not running on a 4700 right now. It is a Pentium 133 with 96mb of memory running gated. Actually, it runs just fine. The box is barely loade and we have no problems with it at all. In message <348FA5C8.AC9C8774 () wisper net>, Leigh Porter writes:
Alex Bligh wrote:I've got a router on Mae West with an open peering policy that has close to 70 peers.Sorry, we are not at MAE(E/W) right now. What effect does running 70 peers on a 4700 give, is ita memory or just a not enough UMPH problem?1. Consider using RA for less important peers. This saves you EBGP sessions.2. I'm running a 7507 at MAE-East with a similar number of peers which is as stable as MAE-East allows it to be.-- Leigh Porter
Current thread:
- handling large numbers of EBGP peers Rob Liebschutz (Dec 10)
- Re: handling large numbers of EBGP peers Alex Bligh (Dec 10)
- Re: handling large numbers of EBGP peers Leigh Porter (Dec 11)
- Re: handling large numbers of EBGP peers rob (Dec 11)
- Re: handling large numbers of EBGP peers Leigh Porter (Dec 11)
- Re: handling large numbers of EBGP peers Aaron Hughes (Dec 10)
- Re: handling large numbers of EBGP peers Alex Bligh (Dec 10)